AI Writing Feedback Generator for Teachers

Argumentative and persuasive essays are the primary use case. The AI excels at drafting feedback on thesis clarity, quality of evidence, depth of analysis, and logical structure, criteria that are consistent across the rubric. Students receive specific feedback on each criterion rather than a general comment that they struggle to act on.

Research reports benefit from rubric alignment to criteria like source quality, citation accuracy, introduction structure, and body paragraph development. The AI flags unsupported claims and identifies where the student summarised sources rather than synthesising them, a common weakness in student research writing.

Science lab reports have a consistent structure (hypothesis, method, results, discussion, conclusion) that maps well to rubric assessment. The AI checks whether each section is present and complete, whether the data is correctly interpreted in the discussion, and whether the conclusion answers the hypothesis.

Formative writing tasks that teachers would not otherwise mark in detail can now receive meaningful feedback. A quick in-class writing task that the teacher would normally just stamp and return can go through the AI feedback tool and deliver one targeted, teacher-approved comment to each student, feedback that actually helps them improve for the next task.