Admissions Management for K-12 Schools
For independent K-12 schools, charter schools, magnet schools, and parochial schools — admissions and enrollment management with lottery and waitlist for charters, sibling-preference workflow, FERPA and COPPA defaults for under-13 students, financial aid packaging for independent schools, and state authorizer audit trails. Used by 8,200+ K-12 schools across NAIS, NCEA, ISACS, ACSI member networks and US public charter networks.
K-12 admissions management software handles enrollment for K-12 schools — independent school admissions cycles, charter school lottery enrollment, magnet school selective admission, parochial school enrollment, financial aid packaging, sibling and legacy preferences, FERPA / COPPA controls for under-13 students, and state authorizer audit trails. OpenEduCat's K-12 admissions module is LGPLv3 open-source, used by 8,200+ K-12 schools globally.
solutionPage.featuresTitle
solutionPage.featuresSubtitle
Lottery & Waitlist Enrollment for Charter / Magnet Schools
Charter and magnet school lottery enrollment: application intake (paper, online, partner referral), eligibility verification (residency, sibling preference, founder family, faculty children per state allowance), random-number lottery execution with audit trail, waitlist ordering, and offer letters. State authorizer audit of lottery process supports renewal documentation. Multi-grade lotteries handle simultaneously with kindergarten priority where state law specifies.
Sibling, Legacy & Faculty-Child Preference
Sibling preference: a student with an enrolled sibling at the school admits before non-sibling applicants in the same lottery / queue. Legacy preference (where school policy includes legacy): grandchildren or children of alumni receive priority. Faculty-child preference: children of school faculty receive priority per school policy (and where state law permits for charter / public schools). Preference workflow is auditable and aligns with state authorizer or school policy.
Independent School Admissions Cycle
Independent schools (NAIS, NCEA, ISACS, ACSI, ECIS) run admissions cycles each fall through spring with deadlines (typical: round-1 deadline early January, round-2 deadline early February, decision release mid-March, deposit due April 10). Cycle workflow respects per-school timing: application intake, parent-interview scheduling, child-visit / shadow-day scheduling, admissions committee review, decision release, and deposit collection.
FERPA & COPPA Defaults for Under-13 Applicants
COPPA (Children's Online Privacy Protection Act) governs services collecting data on children under 13. The platform enforces COPPA defaults: parent consent captured at application; minimal data collection; no third-party tracking pixels; deletion-on-request honoured per COPPA Section 312.6. FERPA-aligned access controls: applicants are not yet enrolled, so FERPA technically does not apply pre-enrollment, but the platform applies FERPA-style protections preemptively. School-level policies (Are applications kept post-decision? For how long? Who can access?) configure transparently.
Financial Aid Packaging for Independent Schools
NAIS-affiliated independent schools and parochial schools offer need-based and merit-based aid. Aid packaging integrates with admissions: SSS by NAIS, FACTS Grant & Aid Assessment, or TADS for need analysis; merit-aid criteria (academic, athletic, talent, community engagement) per school policy; sibling and faculty-child remission; donor-restricted scholarships matched to applicant criteria. Aid offers release with admission letters.
State Authorizer & Public Reporting
State authorizer report templates (Texas TEA, California CDE, New York SED / SUNY, Florida DOE, Illinois ISBE, North Carolina DPI, etc.) pre-configured for charter school authorizer reporting on enrollment, lottery audit, waitlist, and demographic distribution. State public school reporting (TSDS, CALPADS, SIRS, ISBE SIS, FOCUS) generates from source enrollment data without parallel reporting databases.
Multi-Grade & Multi-Campus Enrollment
K-12 schools with multiple campuses (independent school groups, parochial diocese, charter networks) handle enrollment across campuses with one platform. Sibling preference crosses campuses (a 5th grader at the elementary campus gives priority to a younger sibling applying to that elementary, and an older sibling applying to the upper-school campus). Multi-grade enrollment for boarding-school-style residential admission, K-12 schools with shared lower / middle / upper school campuses, and IB Continuum schools.
Re-Enrollment & Contract Execution
Independent schools run re-enrollment cycles in January-February with binding tuition contracts. Re-enrollment contracts execute electronically through the platform — parents review, accept, and pay re-enrollment deposit in one workflow. Re-enrollment yield by grade tracks live; admissions teams know how many seats open before April. Charter schools handle annual re-enrollment with grade promotion (rising 5th grader confirms enrollment for next year by April, releasing waitlisted applicants).
solutionPage.useCasesTitle
solutionPage.useCasesSubtitle
solutionPage.useCasesChallengeLabel
NAIS day schools run Veracross or Blackbaud School Manager admissions module plus separate SSS by NAIS for need analysis plus separate Mailchimp for prospective-family communication. Annual systems spend exceeds $40K-150K. Admissions cycle reconciliation across systems creates lag during reading week.
solutionPage.useCasesOutcomeLabel
OpenEduCat consolidates application intake, financial aid packaging (with SSS by NAIS / FACTS Grant & Aid integration), parent communication, and re-enrollment into one platform. Admissions cycle runs from one source of truth. Annual systems spend drops 60-80%. NAIS DASL reporting on admissions yield, financial aid distribution, and applicant-pool demographics generates from source data.
solutionPage.useCasesChallengeLabel
Charter networks coordinate centralized lottery rules with per-school operational autonomy. State authorizer audit requires immutable lottery audit trail. Existing charter SIS platforms force one-size-fits-all lottery configuration; CMOs running 25 schools across 3 states with 3 different authorizer rule sets struggle.
solutionPage.useCasesOutcomeLabel
Multi-school mode handles per-state authorizer rules: Texas TEA charter authorizer rules, California CDE Charter Schools Division rules, New York SUNY / SED rules. Each school's lottery runs per its authorizer's requirements; CMO sees consolidated enrollment, lottery, and waitlist data across all schools. State authorizer audit trail is immutable per school. Renewal applications package data automatically.
solutionPage.useCasesChallengeLabel
Catholic diocesan schools, Christian classical schools, Jewish day schools, Islamic schools, and Friends/Quaker schools run admissions on legacy diocesan-IT systems or generic K-12 SIS that doesn't handle parish-of-residence verification, sacramental records (Catholic schools), Hebrew curriculum tracking (Jewish day schools), or Friends-style consensus admissions.
solutionPage.useCasesOutcomeLabel
Faith-tradition-specific admissions configures per school: parish-of-residence verification for Catholic schools (often determines tuition tier — in-parish vs out-of-parish tuition), sacramental records integration, Hebrew curriculum placement testing for Jewish day schools, Friends-style admissions consensus workflow for Quaker schools. Diocesan or national-association reporting (NCEA, ACSI, AJES, Friends Council on Education) generates from source data.
solutionPage.faqTitle
solutionPage.faqSubtitle
How does charter school lottery enrollment work?
Charter school lottery typically runs annually for available seats. Application intake captures paper applications, online applications, and partner-referral applications. Eligibility verification confirms residency (in-district / out-of-district per charter agreement), sibling preference, founder-family preference (where allowed), and faculty-children preference (where allowed by state law). Random-number lottery executes with immutable audit trail; waitlist orders results for offers as seats open through summer. Offer letters tie to enrollment confirmation deposits. State authorizer audit reviews the lottery process — the audit trail makes that audit straightforward. Per NAPCS, 7,800+ US charter schools serve 3.7M students, all under lottery-based enrollment.
How does sibling preference work for K-12 admissions?
Sibling preference: a student with a currently-enrolled sibling at the school admits before non-sibling applicants in the same lottery (charter / magnet) or queue (independent). Independent schools typically grant sibling preference automatically unless space-constrained; charter schools grant sibling preference per state authorizer rules (most states allow sibling preference; specifics vary). The platform tracks family-unit relationships across applications and active enrollments — a Smith family applicant identifies as sibling of currently-enrolled Smith student automatically. Multi-grade lotteries with sibling preference run cleanly: the kindergarten lottery considers an applicant's sibling at fourth grade for sibling priority.
How does FERPA and COPPA apply to K-12 admissions?
COPPA governs online services collecting data on children under 13 — applies to nearly all K-12 admissions data. The platform enforces COPPA defaults: parent consent at application; minimal data collection; no third-party behavioral advertising; no third-party tracking pixels on application forms; deletion-on-request honoured per COPPA Section 312.6. FERPA technically applies to enrolled students, not applicants — but the platform applies FERPA-style protections preemptively for applicants. School policies on application retention post-decision configure transparently: many schools delete declined / withdrawn applications after one year per their privacy policy.
Does it integrate with SSS by NAIS, FACTS Grant & Aid, or TADS for financial aid?
Yes. Independent schools handling need-based financial aid run analysis through SSS by NAIS (most common at NAIS member schools), FACTS Grant & Aid Assessment, or TADS (used by some Christian schools). The platform integrates with all three — household financial documentation submits to the third-party analyzer; analysis results (estimated parent contribution, recommended aid amount) flow back into the school's admissions / financial aid workflow; aid officer adjusts per school policy and per available aid budget; final aid offer goes out with admission letter or shortly after. Sibling discount, faculty-child remission, and merit aid layer onto need-based packaging transparently.
How does re-enrollment work for independent schools and charters?
Independent schools run re-enrollment cycles each January-February with binding tuition contracts. Contracts release first week of January; signed and deposit paid by Feb 15-March 1; late re-enrollment per school policy. Contracts execute electronically through the platform — parents review terms (tuition, payment plan, withdrawal-fee policy, force-majeure clauses), accept with audit trail, pay re-enrollment deposit, and confirm tuition payment plan in one workflow. Charter schools handle annual re-enrollment differently: rising students confirm enrollment for the next year by April (typical timeline), releasing waitlisted applicants for the lottery slots. Both workflows track re-enrollment yield by grade live.
solutionPage.relatedTitle
solutionPage.relatedSubtitle
Admissions Management for Universities
For research universities, public flagships, private universities, and graduate schools — admissions management with Common App, UCAS, UAC, UCAS-Conservatoires, and UGC/AICTE/CUET intake; reader workflow with holistic review rubrics; financial aid linkage; yield-modelling dashboards; and IPEDS / HESA reporting from source data. Used by 6,000+ universities worldwide.
solutionPage.exploreLinkAdmissions Management for Colleges
For 4-year colleges, regional universities, liberal arts colleges, and tertiary colleges — admissions management with Common App and Coalition intake, NACAC post-2020 ethical recruitment workflow, transfer-credit articulation against catalog equivalency tables, financial aid packaging tied to admissions decisions, and regional accreditation reporting. Used by 6,800+ colleges worldwide.
solutionPage.exploreLink